A LinkedIn post is decided in its first two lines. Here is what gets distributed, how long a post should be, and which formats take the most feed space.
A LinkedIn post lives or dies on its first two lines, because that is all the feed shows before a "see more" link. Everything else — length, format, hashtags — is downstream of whether someone clicks to expand.
The fold is the whole design problem
LinkedIn truncates a post after roughly two or three lines on desktop and fewer on mobile. Expanding is a deliberate act, and it is also a signal LinkedIn measures.
The preview draws the post as LinkedIn renders it, with the hidden half greyed out in place rather than reported as a character count — which is the only way to see whether your hook survives. Detail: where LinkedIn puts See more.
Roughly 900 to 1,300 characters for a text post. Long enough to say something, short enough that the expanded version does not look like homework.
Structure that works in that budget:
Hook. One line. A claim, a number, or an admission.
The turn. One line that makes the first one make sense.
The substance. Three or four short paragraphs, one idea each.
The close. The point, plainly. A question only if you genuinely want answers.
Line breaks matter more here than on any other platform: LinkedIn renders single-line paragraphs cleanly, and a solid block of text is skipped regardless of quality.
Formats, by how much feed space they take
Format
Space
Notes
Document post (PDF carousel)
Largest
Swipeable, holds attention longest
Native image
Large
1200×1200 or 1080×1350
Text only
Medium
Fine when the writing carries it
Native video
Large
Needs captions; most people watch muted
Link post
Smallest
The card is fixed and small
Document posts are the format worth learning — one idea per page, large type, and a first page that is a hook rather than a title.
A link post produces a small card and sends people away, both of which work against it. The widespread workaround — image or text in the post, link in the first comment — is unverified as a distribution lever, but it is definitely true that a native image takes more feed space than a link card.
Whichever you choose, the card comes from the linked page rather than the post:
About three hashtags, at the end — LinkedIn hashtags. Mentions are more powerful than tags on LinkedIn because a mention notifies a person, but only mention people who are genuinely part of the post; tagging ten people who are not is the fastest way to be muted.
Who the audience actually is
The single most useful thing to understand about LinkedIn is that the audience is not your connections. It is your connections' feeds, plus whoever follows the hashtags you used, plus - crucially - the people who see the post because someone they know commented on it.
That last route is why comments matter disproportionately here. A comment does not just signal engagement to the ranking system; it physically surfaces the post to a new set of people. A post with twenty thoughtful comments has been shown to twenty extended networks.
Two things follow, and they are the opposite of what most posting advice suggests.
Write things people can respond to substantively. Not "agree?" - a claim specific enough that a peer has something to add. Practitioners commenting with their own experience is the mechanism working correctly.
Reply to every comment, properly. A reply is another comment, it keeps the thread active, and on a professional network it is also just good manners with a direct distribution benefit attached.
What actually gets distributed
Engagement in the first hour, and dwell time. Both favour posts that are worth expanding and reading rather than posts that are optimised for a click.
Two things follow. Consistency beats volume — two considered posts a week outperform daily filler, because credibility is the currency on a professional network. And comments are worth more than likes, both as a signal and because a comment thread brings a post back into feeds.
LinkedIn's own guidance for creators is in its help centre, and the engagement bands to compare yourself against are in social media benchmarks.